Future status of the private lessor: flat tax or damping?

The parliamentary mission on the future tax status of the private lessor renders its conclusions on June 30. One of the measures lies in a damping of the property, deductible from rental income. Norbert Fanchon, president of the Gambetta group promoter, prefers a flat tax, he explains in “the big real estate meeting” (Capital/Radio Immo).

Capital video: Real estate: Jean-Qui-Rit in the old, Jean-Qui-Pleure in the new

• 
  

  To safeguard
  

  
  
  

  Saved
  

A real fiscal status, lasting, rewarding their role as economic agents who rent housing to students, young workers, families: this is what rental investors could finally benefit from next year, if the future status of the private landlord has a good body in the finance bill for 2026, as the Minister of Housing, Valérie Létard wishes. Who the Senator Marc-Philippe Daubresse and the deputy Mickaël Cosson will present, this Monday, June 30, their proposals for the definition of this famous status.

Among these proposals, that the two parliamentarians want “Shocks”the implementation of a damping Accountant, at least 5% of the value of the property, deductible each year rental income. “It’s complicated”Judge Norbert Fanchon, president of the Gambetta group promoter, guest of the program “Le Grand Rendez-vous de l’Emal desire” (Capital/Radio Immo) on June 19. What is needed, to relaunch a rental investment market undermined by the supervision of rents, the explosion of the property tax, the prohibition for the rental of thermal stores and the recent disappearance of the Pinel system, it is “A simple measure”, As simple as this tax advantage was, he pleads.

A heat wave: the owners soon forced to install these 2 equipment with their tenants?

No rental investors, no accommodation!

This is why Norbert Fanchon would prefer that the future status of the private lessor goes through a “flat tax“, Rather than damping. “With a single tax rate of 30%, this flat tax would be both simple, effective because it is lower than the current level of real estate taxation, often above 50%, and fair because aligned with capital taxation”argues the Gambetta group pattern. While recognizing that “We are not Not many to defend this idea»»which may not win the favors of the Ministry of the Economy either, looking for 40 billion euros in savings within the framework of the finance bill for 2026.

Norbert Fanchon does not give up: “The best incentive, for rental investors, is flat tax”. Rental investors who have so disappeared from the market “That a quarter of the programs that the promoters have plans, they cannot launch the construction, today ”failing to have sufficiently pre-commercialized housing to convince the banks to finance them. Six years ago, “When rental investors represented 35% of sales, we launch all our programs!”recalls the leader. For whom “No rental investors, it simply means no accommodation”whether they are intended for rental, social and private, or home ownership.

Rental real estate: 1 million less accommodation for tenants within 30 months?

Your “It concerns you” section

Like every month, experts – notaries, lawyers, real estate agents – of your “It concerns” section answer your questions. This month, Stéphanie Gaillard, spokesperson for notaries of Greater Paris, deciphers the consequences of the lack of energy performance diagnosis on the sale of a dilapidated house. Dan Adler, real estate agent in Paris, responds to the heir to a beautiful Haussmann F5 in the capital, who wonders if the time is appropriate to sell it, after two and a half years of real estate crisis. As for Manuel Raison, a lawyer in Paris also, he looks at the question of a co -owner worried about the installation, by the trustee, of surveillance cameras in the entrance hall of the building and in the common corridors.