Will Maprimérenov difficulties: Are the bans to rent will be questioned?

Free tribune

The suspension of Maprimérenov for magnitude renovations, from this Monday, June 23, pushes certain professionals of the energy renovation to claim a questioning of the gradual prohibition for the rental of thermal colanders. “This is without saying what the government is doing,” said Henry Buzy-Cazaux, founding president of the Institute for Real Estate Management.

• 
  

  To safeguard
  

  
  
  

  Saved
  

The episode linked to the questioning by the Minister of the Economy of Maprimerénov will have left traces and open from the breaches. Analysis of a dangerous logic -understandable that it is-, which links the realization of the energy transition of housing using the State. We now know that the government, Valérie Létard at the maneuver, will not return to the budgetary commitments of 3.6 billion voted by the Parliament and that the aid will not be put down. We also know what adjustments are made in its distribution to households, an interruption of receiving new files from Monday, June 23 until September, with the exception of monogenic work, and eligibility criteria modified at the start of the school year to end the year. It is likely that the aid is refocused on the income of the first deciles of income, which will be difficult to be indignant in this period.

Psychodrama is now known: Éric Lombard in a quick declaration sets fire to the powder, also probably to arouse the French at the idea that public aid would no longer be in the near future, from the finance bill for 2026, which they were for years, and 2020 for Maprimerenov, date of its creation. The Minister of Housing scraped with Bercy so that there is no solution for final continuity- that is to say a strong break- in the process of supporting families towards the environmental transfer of the housing park, in particular at rental destination, the bad labels of the DPE being struck with the prohibition to rent. Valérie Létard, attached to dialogue and clarity, brought together the stakeholders on June 17 to tell them what was the precise situation and play down.

Maprimérenov ‘: Last days to submit your file for this work before the suspension!

Question the obligations of the climate and resilience law

However, the reactions continue, and certain actors, after having heard the development of the Minister and the final decision of Matignon, consider that the risks which have emerged must lead to questioning purely and simply the obligations of the CLIMATE Resilience of August 22, 2021, accused of all the evils, voted without real measure of its impact on the French, over -soil in a way. The logic seems unstoppable: no aid or less aid, no eligible legal constraint. Among those who carry this thesis, a large real estate federation, but also bosses of real estate companies. The key, the removal of the prohibitions to rent, in any case the loosening of the calendar fixed by the legislator. It was so far a yellow line that successive governments and parliaments had not wanted to cross.

The national rally has returned back and the repeal of this law a political objective of primary importance, the supplications of part of the sector and complaints of a significant proportion of households. The only problem is that what is against ecological transition is supposed to fight, climate change, is not a chimera but indeed our identified enemy and at work every day. In addition, it was at the housing stock that he has the most serious damage after the people themselves. The decline in the coastline, the swelling of clays, floods and increasingly frequent fires are realities. The tendency increases in multi -risk insurance premiums for buildings, the unassolvedness of some of them, are already tangible consequences.

Maprimerenov: the imperative of continuity

Renovation aids have tripled in 10 years

It is understood that if the state, even for the good of the nation, forces it to expose major expenses, requiring prime importance, it must help households. However, he is no longer in a situation with public money, coming from our taxes, to do so with the same magnitude. The amount of energy renovation aid has tripled in ten years, backing up the rest of the middle classes. Yes, we will have to get used to the idea that the state can impose without cushioning the blow, or the cost in this case. It is true that if he cannot help with financial means he will have to consent flexibility. Here again, deleting prohibitions would not constitute flexibility, but a renunciation and the signal that the energy mutation is optional.

Review the calendar? This is without saying what the government does, in particular by supporting the bill of Amel Gacquerre, senator from the North, which provides that energy customers located in a condominium on the way to start collective environmental recovery work must be exempt from the prohibition to rent. Flexibility still when the Anah (National Habitat National Agency) counter is closed this summer, except for premium request files for monogestes: we are far from the fundamentalism of the beginning of Macronie, which swore by global renovation, in defiance of the contributing capacities of households. Flexibility necessary also when Valérie Létard defends the concept of depreciation of existing rental housing and the works that will be committed to getting them out of their status as a colander or an energy kettle. Athoring the pain therefore linked to therapy, not giving up treatment.

Maprimérenov ‘: you will no longer be able to file a file between these two dates

Less count on public assistance

Those who, under a logic of brass, consider that the state is no longer in a position to impose if he can only help as powerfully as before are in good faith. They nevertheless connect two data that the history of the country has resonated together for decades … and this rhyme, rich, we no longer have the means. Without the state having to stop obliging to what is in the order of the general interest. This means that we will have to draw more from our resources more into the future, although we have it, and less count on public assistance. Cruel certainly. The debate on France’s next budget will have this question for obsessive theme: less enjoy today to save tomorrow, or consider that the issue of the energy transition does not deserve so much individual efforts, and that Advienne that can. “Living and letting die” or “Dying can wait”: everything is in the titles of James Bond.